Performance Profiling Example¶
This example demonstrates the best practices for application performance optimizations with oneDNN.
This example demonstrates the best practices for application performance optimizations with oneDNN.
Example code: performance_profiling.cpp
This example uses DNNL_VERBOSE trace output to tune oneDNN code to align with the best practices.
It assumes knowledge of memory formats and their usage in oneDNN. You can read more about this topic here.
Additionally, see the article for recommended environment for running benchmarks”.
The example has three different implementations of the mathematical operation:
Naive implementation executes 2D convolution followed by ReLU on the data in NCHW format. This implementation does not align with oneDNN best practices and results in suboptimal performance.
Blocked format implementation executes the same operations sequence on the blocked format optimized for convolution performance. This implementation uses
format_tag=ANY
to create a convolution memory descriptor to determine the data format optimal for the convolution implementation. It then propagates the blocked format to the non-intensive ReLU. This implementation results in better overall performance than the naive implementation.Fused implementation executes convolution fused with ReLU on blocked data format. This implementation uses
format_tag=ANY
to create a convolution memory descriptor, and then adds ReLU as a post-op to the convolution primitive. This version implements all of the best practices for inference resulting in the best overall performance.
Walkthrough¶
The program in performance_profiling.cpp includes all three implementations introduced above. You can select the specific implementation using command line options.
After compilation, you can execute each implementation with:
./program.exe [cpu|gpu] [implementation]
Before you run the program, set your DNNL_VERBOSE
environment variable to 1:
export DNNL_VERBOSE=1
The program starts by creating oneDNN memory objects in NCHW format. These are called user_
because they are meant to represent the user’s source data entering oneDNN with the NCHW format.
// set dimensions for synthetic data and weights const memory::dim BATCH = 128; const memory::dim IC = 3, OC = 96; const memory::dim IH = 227, KH = 11, OH = 55; const memory::dim IW = 227, KW = 11, OW = 55;
Note
Here the library allocates memory.
// create oneDNN memory objects for user's tensors (in nchw and oihw formats) auto user_src = memory({{BATCH, IC, IH, IW}, memory::data_type::f32, memory::format_tag::nchw}, eng); auto user_wei = memory({{OC, IC, KH, KW}, memory::data_type::f32, memory::format_tag::oihw}, eng); auto user_dst = memory({{BATCH, OC, OH, OW}, memory::data_type::f32, memory::format_tag::nchw}, eng);
Note
You can change the batch size to easily increase/decrease the workload.
The following descriptions of each implementation will reference each other, and are meant to be read in order.
Naive Implementation¶
This implementation is launched with the following shell code:
./program.exe cpu naive
The program will call the implementation defined in the function conv_relu_naive()
.
First it sets the dimensions and format for convolution memory descriptors (_md
) to match user_
values one md
each for source, destination, and weight data. Then it uses those md
to create the convolution descriptor conv_d
, which tells oneDNN to use plain format (NCHW) for the convolution.
// copy the dimensions and format from user's memory auto conv_src_md = memory::desc(user_src.get_desc()); auto conv_wei_md = memory::desc(user_wei.get_desc()); auto conv_dst_md = memory::desc(user_dst.get_desc());
// create a convolution descriptor auto conv_d = convolution_forward::desc(prop_kind::forward_inference, algorithm::convolution_direct, conv_src_md, conv_wei_md, conv_dst_md, strides, padding, padding);
Next the program creates a convolution primitive descriptor conv_pd
and convolution primitive conv
. These structs will inherit NCHW format from md
by way of the conv_d
. Finally it creates the convolution primitive conv
and adds it to the stream s
, and then executes the create_and_execute_relu(user_dst)
function.
// create a convolution primitive descriptor auto conv_pd = convolution_forward::primitive_desc(conv_d, eng);
// create convolution primitive auto conv = convolution_forward(conv_pd);
// execute convolution by adding it to the stream s conv.execute(s, {{DNNL_ARG_SRC, user_src}, {DNNL_ARG_WEIGHTS, user_wei}, {DNNL_ARG_DST, user_dst}});
// execute relu (on convolution's destination format, whatever it is) create_and_execute_relu(user_dst, eng, s); s.wait();
Note
The function for creation and execution of ReLU primitive is defined elsewhere to keep this example clean. It is an non-intensive operation, so the create_and_execute_relu()
function uses whatever the input data format is at the time it is called.
Using NCHW data format may result in suboptimal performance for compute intensive primitives, as shown in the following DNNL_VERBOSE output by the convolution and relu execution times of 38.3 and 2.9 milliseconds, respectively.
DNNL_VERBOSE output (see configuration notice*):
dnnl_verbose,exec,cpu,convolution,gemm:jit,forward_inference,src_f32::blocked:abcd:f0 wei_f32::blocked:abcd:f0 bia_undef::undef::f0 dst_f32::blocked:abcd:f0,,alg:convolution_direct,mb128_ic3oc96_ih227oh55kh11sh4dh0ph0_iw227ow55kw11sw4dw0pw0,38.314 dnnl_verbose,exec,cpu,eltwise,jit:avx512_common,forward_inference,data_f32::blocked:abcd:f0 diff_undef::undef::f0,,alg:eltwise_relu alpha:0 beta:0,128x96x55x55,2.87695
In Blocked format implementation, we will incorporate the best practice of letting oneDNN determine the optimal format for convolution primitive.
Blocked format implementation¶
This implementation is launched with the following shell code:
./program.exe cpu blocked
The program will call the implementation defined in the function conv_relu_blocked()
.
First it creates the md as in naive implementation. Next it changes the dnnl::memory::format_tag for each md to ANY
. Then it uses those md to create the convolution descriptor conv_d, which tells oneDNN to use whatever format it recommends for the convolution. oneDNN will choose a friendly blocked format.
// copy the dimensions and format from user's memory auto conv_src_md = memory::desc(user_src.get_desc()); auto conv_wei_md = memory::desc(user_wei.get_desc()); auto conv_dst_md = memory::desc(user_dst.get_desc()); // reset format to "any" to allow convolution to pick the best implementation conv_src_md.data.format_kind = dnnl_format_kind_any; conv_wei_md.data.format_kind = dnnl_format_kind_any; conv_dst_md.data.format_kind = dnnl_format_kind_any;
// create a convolution descriptor auto conv_d = convolution_forward::desc(prop_kind::forward_inference, algorithm::convolution_direct, conv_src_md, conv_wei_md, conv_dst_md, strides, padding, padding);
Next the program creates a convolution primitive descriptor conv_pd and convolution primitive conv as in naive implementation. However, in this implementation the structs will inherit blocked format from md by way of the conv_d.
// create a convolution primitive descriptor and primitive auto conv_pd = convolution_forward::primitive_desc(conv_d, eng);
Since the resulting convolution primitive will expect blocked source data, conditional reorders are inserted to convert input data to blocked format if required. The input data user_src is NCHW, so this conditional will be triggered:
Note
The reoders are applied using oneDNN reorder
primitive.
// prepare convolution source memory conv_src = user_src; if (conv_pd.src_desc() != user_src.get_desc()) { conv_src = memory(conv_pd.src_desc(), eng); auto r_pd = reorder::primitive_desc(user_src, conv_src); reorder(r_pd).execute(s, user_src, conv_src); } // prepare convolution weights memory conv_wei = user_wei; if (conv_pd.weights_desc() != user_wei.get_desc()) { conv_wei = memory(conv_pd.weights_desc(), eng); auto r_pd = reorder::primitive_desc(user_wei, conv_wei); reorder(r_pd).execute(s, user_wei, conv_wei); } // prepare convolution destination memory conv_dst = user_dst; if (conv_pd.dst_desc() != user_dst.get_desc()) conv_dst = memory(conv_pd.dst_desc(), eng);
Finally it creates the convolution primitive conv
and adds it to the stream s
with the reordered data (conv_src
, conv_wei
, conv_dst1
) as inputs and then executes the create_and_execute_relu(conv_dst)
function.
// create convolution primitive auto conv = convolution_forward(conv_pd);
// execute convolution by adding it to the stream s conv.execute(s, {{DNNL_ARG_SRC, conv_src}, {DNNL_ARG_WEIGHTS, conv_wei}, {DNNL_ARG_DST, conv_dst}});
// execute relu (on convolution's destination format, whatever it is) create_and_execute_relu(conv_dst, eng, s);
Blocked memory format is recommended for oneDNN primitive execution and provides better performance, as shown in the DNNL_VERBOSE output by the convolution and relu execution times of 18.3 and 2.7 milliseconds (down from 38.3 and 2.9 in naive implementation), respectively. In this implementation, there is an additional reorder operation that executes before and after the the conv + relu. This small cost is worth the gain from executing in blocked format. If fact, it becomes negligible when chaining together multiple oneDNN operations in succession. In these situations, you can do one reorder at the beginning and one at the end of the chain, and only pay the reorder penalty at those points in the execution.
DNNL_VERBOSE output (see configuration notice*):
dnnl_verbose,exec,cpu,reorder,jit:uni,undef,src_f32::blocked:abcd:f0 dst_f32::blocked:Acdb16a:f0,,,96x3x11x11,0.0310059 dnnl_verbose,exec,cpu,convolution,jit:avx512_common,forward_inference,src_f32::blocked:abcd:f0 wei_f32::blocked:Acdb16a:f0 bia_undef::undef::f0 dst_f32::blocked:aBcd16b:f0,,alg:convolution_direct,mb128_ic3oc96_ih227oh55kh11sh4dh0ph0_iw227ow55kw11sw4dw0pw0,18.3101 dnnl_verbose,exec,cpu,eltwise,jit:avx512_common,forward_inference,data_f32::blocked:aBcd16b:f0 diff_undef::undef::f0,,alg:eltwise_relu alpha:0 beta:0,128x96x55x55,2.66895 dnnl_verbose,exec,cpu,reorder,jit:uni,undef,src_f32::blocked:aBcd16b:f0 dst_f32::blocked:abcd:f0,,,128x96x55x55,4.80396
This inference implementation is closer to best practices than naive implementation because it uses oneDNN recommended memory format. fused implementation will futher optimize the performance by fusing convolution with ReLU using oneDNN post-ops.
Fused Implementation¶
This implementation is launched with the following shell code:
./program.exe cpu fused
The program will call the implementation defined in the function conv_relu_fused()
.
First the memory descriptors and convolution descriptor are created as in naive implementation.
Then in preparation for the convolution prim desctiptor, a ReLU post-op is built and added to the primitive attribute attr
:
// function to create post-op attribute for fused relu primitive_attr create_attr_with_relu_post_op() { // create a post-op with relu post_ops ops; ops.append_eltwise(1.f, algorithm::eltwise_relu, 0.f, 0.f); // create an attribute and set the corresponding post op primitive_attr attr; attr.set_post_ops(ops); return attr; }
post-op by way of the attributes attr
:
// create an attribute for fused relu auto attr = create_attr_with_relu_post_op(); // create a convolution primitive descriptor auto conv_pd = convolution_forward::primitive_desc(conv_d, attr, eng);
Then conditional reorders are applied as in blocked format implementation to convert user_
format NCHW to blocked. Finally, it creates the convolution primitive conv
and adds it to the stream s
with the reordered data (conv_src
, conv_wei
, conv_dst1
).
Note
There is no separate addition to the stream for the ReLU operation because it has been added as a post-op to the conv
primitive.
// create convolution primitive auto conv = convolution_forward(conv_pd);
// execute convolution by adding it to the stream s conv.execute(s, {{DNNL_ARG_SRC, conv_src}, {DNNL_ARG_WEIGHTS, conv_wei}, {DNNL_ARG_DST, conv_dst}});
This implementation complies with best practices for f32 inference by using the oneDNN recommended blocked format for convolution and adding ReLU as a post-op to execute a fused version of conv + ReLU. The consequence to following best practices can be seen in the execution time of the fused primitive of 18.0 milliseconds.
DNNL_VERBOSE output (see configuration notice*):
dnnl_verbose,exec,cpu,reorder,jit:uni,undef,src_f32::blocked:abcd:f0 dst_f32::blocked:Acdb16a:f0,,,96x3x11x11,0.0148926 dnnl_verbose,exec,cpu,convolution,jit:avx512_common,forward_inference,src_f32::blocked:abcd:f0 wei_f32::blocked:Acdb16a:f0 bia_undef::undef::f0 dst_f32::blocked:aBcd16b:f0,post_ops:'eltwise_relu;';,alg:convolution_direct,mb128_ic3oc96_ih227oh55kh11sh4dh0ph0_iw227ow55kw11sw4dw0pw0,17.968 dnnl_verbose,exec,cpu,reorder,jit:uni,undef,src_f32::blocked:aBcd16b:f0 dst_f32::blocked:abcd:f0,,,128x96x55x55,4.66797
Performance summary¶
Implementation |
Time, ms |
Cumulative speedup |
---|---|---|
Naive |
41.2 |
1.0 |
Blocked format |
21.0 |
2.0 |
Fused |
18.0 |
2.3 |
Configuration Notice¶
Note
This example is meant to demonstrate oneDNN best practices.
Note
It is not meant for benchmarking purposes. The platform is not fully
Note
optimized, so the primitive execution times are only relevant in
Note
relation to the other times in this example.
Runtime Settings:
OMP_NUM_THREADS=14
KMP_AFFINITY=granularity=fine,compact
Platform:
CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8180 CPU @ 2.50GHz
Thread(s) per core: 1
Core(s) per socket: 28
Socket(s): 2
NUMA node(s): 2
RAM (DDR4): 192 GB